Self directed 401(k)s are being heavily marketed as a preferred alternative to self directed IRAs. ?They generally cost more to set up (although there can be significant downstream savings for some investors), which provides much of the marketing incentive for the businesses marketing them. ?Typically, these self directed 401(k)s involve a ?Solo-K? or Small Business 401(k), which limit employment to no more than a few immediate family members. ?This is done primarily to avoid the regulations regarding ?highly compensated employees,? which by definition includes ownership regardless of income.
As a result, self directed 401(k)s, which for some people but not all, have advantages over self directed IRAs, is only available to people who own bona fide active businesses. ?However, if the business is large enough to have more than a few employees who are not close family, it is typically impractical or disadvantageous to have a self directed 401(k) plan for the business which allows investment in non-traditional assets.
Caveat: the temptation to use independent contractors in place of employees should be avoided, or at least done only after legal consultation, as that can lead to substantial liability and penalties.
?
__________________________
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE:? To ensure compliance with requirements by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
augusta national blake griffin pau gasol marlins park marbury v. madison 2013 lincoln mkz burger king mary j blige
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.